Fed Expected to Cut Rates, and C.E.O. Shooting Suspect Branded Terrorist
-
Plus, a beefy new skin care trend.
44 minutes ago
Posts
Friday, July 29, 2011
USA2007: People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTime...
USA2007: People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTime...: "People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTimes.com"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Seed Newsvine
.jpg)
For centuries thinkers have assumed that the uniquely human capacity for reasoning has existed to let people reach beyond mere perception and reflex in the search for truth. Rationality allowed a solitary thinker to blaze a path to philosophical, moral and scientific enlightenment.
ReplyDeleteNow some researchers are suggesting that reason evolved for a completely different purpose: to win arguments. Rationality, by this yardstick (and irrationality too, but we’ll get to that) is nothing more or less than a servant of the hard-wired compulsion to triumph in the debating arena. According to this view, bias, lack of logic and other supposed flaws that pollute the stream of reason are instead social adaptations that enable one group to persuade (and defeat) another. Certitude works, however sharply it may depart from the truth.