add widget ''networkedblogs_nwidget_container''

Google App Engine

Powered by Google App Engine

AddThisToAny.com/share_save

Share

My Blog List

Pages

blog2010ray2.blogspot.com

blog2010ray2.blogspot.com

Blog2010ray2

rl2socialnet.blogspot.com

//rayloke1-newblog.blogspot.com/

//rayloke1-newblog.blogspot.com/

//rayloke1-rl-usa2007.blogspot.com/

//rl-usa2007.blogspot@blogger.com

//Australia2008@blogger.com

//picasaweb.google.com/rayloke1

swiz

swiz
eu

EU EURO COUNTRIES

Friday, July 29, 2011

USA2007: People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTime...

USA2007: People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTime...: "People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTimes.com"

1 comment:

  1. For centuries thinkers have assumed that the uniquely human capacity for reasoning has existed to let people reach beyond mere perception and reflex in the search for truth. Rationality allowed a solitary thinker to blaze a path to philosophical, moral and scientific enlightenment.

    Now some researchers are suggesting that reason evolved for a completely different purpose: to win arguments. Rationality, by this yardstick (and irrationality too, but we’ll get to that) is nothing more or less than a servant of the hard-wired compulsion to triumph in the debating arena. According to this view, bias, lack of logic and other supposed flaws that pollute the stream of reason are instead social adaptations that enable one group to persuade (and defeat) another. Certitude works, however sharply it may depart from the truth.

    ReplyDelete