Retro CSS Text Effect: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
-
CSS offers an array of tools that, when used correctly, can improve the
visual experience on your website. In this introductory tutorial, we’ll
explore a...
It’s Not What You Say, But How You Say It
-
Match your content with your intent
*“My strength is the strength of ten,*
*Because my heart is pure.”*
*— Alfred, Lord Tennyson, 1842*
Did you ever ...
-
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) Outruns Peers, Surges 38% in a Year
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/las-vegas-sands-lvs-outruns-185906586.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc...
Dos vs Don’ts on Social Media in 2016
-
Since social media comes to our life, it has changed the way people
connect, discover, and share information dramatically. It is really nothing
more than p...
Responsive Design is a Kind of Big Deal
-
Did you know that if your website doesn’t have a responsive design, which
means the content doesn’t adapt to a variety of screen sizes, your SEO
efforts ...
Moving on from Picasa
-
*Update March 26, 2018*: The Picasa Desktop application will no longer work
online, which means that you will not be able to upload or download photos
and ...
Aliens From Hell - Freeman at Conspiracy Con 2013
-
What occult practices have the Nazis, and now NASA, employed to communicate
and channel entities into our dimension. What is the real purpose of the
billio...
Bankruptcy in Malaysia
-
Courtesy of: iMoney.my
http://www.imoney.my/articles/bankruptcy/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=Traffic_MY_all_RSS
A reminder to update Picasa
-
*We just updated Picasa. To ensure that sharing to Google+ still works,
please update to the latest version or turn on automatic updates. Thanks,
and happy...
Improvements to the Blogger template HTML editor
-
Posted by: +Samantha Schaffer and +Renee Kwang, Software Engineer Interns.
Whether you’re a web developer who builds blog templates for a living, or a
web...
Appointment Scheduling Gadget
-
From our awesome friends at DaringLabs.
[image: Powered by Google App Engine]
Yes, I want to book appointments from my blog!
Use your blog to drum up ...
The blurry photos, called a "grotesque" abuse of privacy by royal officials, show Kate — the Duchess of Cambridge — wearing only a skimpy bikini bottom. They are the first to show Britain's likely future queen with her bosom exposed. St. James's Palace officials sharply criticized the magazine moments after the photos hit French newsstands, comparing the intrusion on the young couple's privacy to the tragic paparazzi pursuit of Diana, which many believe was a contributing factor in her early death on Aug. 31, 1997. The parallels between the past and the present were eerie. Diana was hounded by paparazzi who took telephoto shots of her vacationing on a yacht with her boyfriend Dodi and tailed them relentlessly in Paris. Earlier this month, a photographer with a similar long lens captured Kate and William relaxing in the sun at a private estate in Provence, a vacation spot near the French Riviera. Instead of challenging the authenticity of the blurry photos, palace officials said they appear genuine — and should never have been taken, much less published. "The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to the Duke and Duchess for being so," a St. James's Palace official in London said in a statement. The British media — chastened by a deep scandal over phone hacking and other misdeeds — all shied away from using the photos. That restraint came even though Rupert Murdoch's The Sun tabloid is famed for its daily "Page 3" topless shots. The photos, which were not available on English newsstands, appeared to unite many Britons behind their royal family. "I think it's quite outrageous," said Alice Mason, 24, from London. "They were on holidays in a private place and some creepy journalist took pictures. It's not in the public interest to see this. "They are always going to be in the public eye, but there is a line, and they (the media) crossed that line." She said the royal couple has "every right to be outraged, especially with what happened to Diana." Much of the anger seemed to stem from the fact that the royal couple was at a private residence when they were photographed.
The blurry photos, called a "grotesque" abuse of privacy by royal officials, show Kate — the Duchess of Cambridge — wearing only a skimpy bikini bottom. They are the first to show Britain's likely future queen with her bosom exposed.
ReplyDeleteSt. James's Palace officials sharply criticized the magazine moments after the photos hit French newsstands, comparing the intrusion on the young couple's privacy to the tragic paparazzi pursuit of Diana, which many believe was a contributing factor in her early death on Aug. 31, 1997.
The parallels between the past and the present were eerie. Diana was hounded by paparazzi who took telephoto shots of her vacationing on a yacht with her boyfriend Dodi and tailed them relentlessly in Paris.
Earlier this month, a photographer with a similar long lens captured Kate and William relaxing in the sun at a private estate in Provence, a vacation spot near the French Riviera.
Instead of challenging the authenticity of the blurry photos, palace officials said they appear genuine — and should never have been taken, much less published.
"The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to the Duke and Duchess for being so," a St. James's Palace official in London said in a statement.
The British media — chastened by a deep scandal over phone hacking and other misdeeds — all shied away from using the photos. That restraint came even though Rupert Murdoch's The Sun tabloid is famed for its daily "Page 3" topless shots.
The photos, which were not available on English newsstands, appeared to unite many Britons behind their royal family.
"I think it's quite outrageous," said Alice Mason, 24, from London. "They were on holidays in a private place and some creepy journalist took pictures. It's not in the public interest to see this.
"They are always going to be in the public eye, but there is a line, and they (the media) crossed that line."
She said the royal couple has "every right to be outraged, especially with what happened to Diana."
Much of the anger seemed to stem from the fact that the royal couple was at a private residence when they were photographed.