add widget ''networkedblogs_nwidget_container''

Google App Engine

Powered by Google App Engine

AddThisToAny.com/share_save

Share

My Blog List

Pages

blog2010ray2.blogspot.com

blog2010ray2.blogspot.com

Blog2010ray2

rl2socialnet.blogspot.com

//rayloke1-newblog.blogspot.com/

//rayloke1-newblog.blogspot.com/

//rayloke1-rl-usa2007.blogspot.com/

//rl-usa2007.blogspot@blogger.com

//Australia2008@blogger.com

//picasaweb.google.com/rayloke1

swiz

swiz
eu

EU EURO COUNTRIES

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Topless tempest: Kate photos spark palace fury - Yahoo! News

Topless tempest: Kate photos spark palace fury - Yahoo! News

1 comment:

  1. The blurry photos, called a "grotesque" abuse of privacy by royal officials, show Kate — the Duchess of Cambridge — wearing only a skimpy bikini bottom. They are the first to show Britain's likely future queen with her bosom exposed.
    St. James's Palace officials sharply criticized the magazine moments after the photos hit French newsstands, comparing the intrusion on the young couple's privacy to the tragic paparazzi pursuit of Diana, which many believe was a contributing factor in her early death on Aug. 31, 1997.
    The parallels between the past and the present were eerie. Diana was hounded by paparazzi who took telephoto shots of her vacationing on a yacht with her boyfriend Dodi and tailed them relentlessly in Paris.
    Earlier this month, a photographer with a similar long lens captured Kate and William relaxing in the sun at a private estate in Provence, a vacation spot near the French Riviera.
    Instead of challenging the authenticity of the blurry photos, palace officials said they appear genuine — and should never have been taken, much less published.
    "The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to the Duke and Duchess for being so," a St. James's Palace official in London said in a statement.
    The British media — chastened by a deep scandal over phone hacking and other misdeeds — all shied away from using the photos. That restraint came even though Rupert Murdoch's The Sun tabloid is famed for its daily "Page 3" topless shots.
    The photos, which were not available on English newsstands, appeared to unite many Britons behind their royal family.
    "I think it's quite outrageous," said Alice Mason, 24, from London. "They were on holidays in a private place and some creepy journalist took pictures. It's not in the public interest to see this.
    "They are always going to be in the public eye, but there is a line, and they (the media) crossed that line."
    She said the royal couple has "every right to be outraged, especially with what happened to Diana."
    Much of the anger seemed to stem from the fact that the royal couple was at a private residence when they were photographed.

    ReplyDelete